Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6260 The New York Times Promotes the Pros of Airless Packaging - Beauty Packaging

What are you searching for?

Sign in
Beauty Industry

The New York Times Promotes the Pros of Airless Packaging

Beauty Packaging contributed to the NY Times article, "How Anti-Aging Creams Get Old Too Fast."

Author Image

By: Marie Redding

Senior Editor, Rodman Media

In the New York Times’ Skin Deep column, “How Anti-Aging Creams Get Old Too Fast,” writer Andrew Adam Newman explains the benefits of airless packaging to consumers – and asked Beauty Packaging magazine to contribute.

In the article, Frauke Neuser, a scientist at Procter & Gamble, explains, “Olay sells many moisturizers in jars, but in-house testing found that formulations with retinol fared poorly in the containers.” He continued, “We know that retinol is very oxygen sensitive and degrades. We certainly wouldn’t put an Olay product with retinol into a jar because we want our product to be just as efficacious and great at the end as it was at the very first.”

Perhaps soon more consumers may prefer airless bottles over jars?

Read the rest of the story here, at The New York Times.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Get the latest Beauty Packaging news, insights and analysis in your Google Search and AI experiences.

Add Beauty Packaging as a preferred source on Google (opens in a new tab)

Keep Up With Our Content. Subscribe To Beauty Packaging Newsletters

Topics